To date, however, many companies have hung back from launching full-scale roll-outs of UC, deterred by concerns over the cost and complexity of the technology involved. Could the idea of hosted UC solutions, delivered as software-as-a-service (SaaS), win them over?
In this article, we examine the 'UC-as-a-service' proposition, the benefits this model offers and how the market is developing.
What is UC-as-a-service?
UCaaS is
an idea in which UC services can be hosted 'in the cloud' - just like
SaaS enterprise applications for salesforce automation, customer
service or human resources management. As with on-premise UC
deployments, UCaaS gives employees a single interface from which to
access all the communications tools they use on a day-to-day basis -
multiple phone numbers (landlines and mobile), email, instant
messaging, teleconferencing and so on. And like on-premise UC, UCaaS
should also be able to take advantage of 'presence' technologies, which
tell users whether the person they're trying to contact is online and
the best way to reach them. And with both on-premise and hosted UC,
communications will 'follow' employees - so if they're away from the
office, voice calls arriving at their desktop are instantly transferred
to their mobile phone, along with emails and instant messages.
So why use a hosted model?
The
difference between on-premise UC and the hosted UC model is that, with
UCaaS, organisations can achieve the kind of connectivity they need
without the need to purchase and install dedicated hardware and
networking equipment and invest in the help they need to integrate
these technologies with existing communications systems.
Instead,
organisations pay a monthly, per-user subscription charge to have these
services available from employees' desktops or mobile devices, via a
web browser. According to research from US-based market analyst firm,
The Radicati Group, the
benefits of buying UC as a service include less burden for onsite IT
teams, lower implementation costs, access to the most up-to-date
technologies, predictable costs, and flexibility.
How is UCaaS delivered?
In
theory, a UCaaS environment, offering the full gamut of telephony,
messaging and presence technologies, resides on the servers of a
third-party provider and is accessed by customers over the Internet.
For example, it may combine a telephony system such as Cisco
CallManager VOIP with Microsoft Exchange and Office Communication
Server (OCS) to provide all three.
A good
provider will also mirror the environment over its own hardware
resources to provide robust failover and disaster recovery
capabilities. In practice, the picture's a little more complicated than
that, because many organisations already have significant
premises-based installations of one or more of these elements
(telephony, messaging, presence). For example, many organisations have
already outsourced their email systems to partners, but continue to run
their telephony environment (such as an IP PBX) in-house. In response,
some partners will now provide integrations between hosted and in-house
systems to create a hybrid solution, with the hope that customers
eventually migrate to a fully hosted UC service.
Another issue is latency. According to Brent Kelly of Wainhouse Research, the
data elements of a UC solution (such as the presence/IM engine,
email/calendaring servers, shared workspace servers) can be easily
provided by a virtualised, third-party environment. The real-time
elements, primarily voice and video, are more difficult to migrate to a
hosted service, "because a virtual environment can add latency and
jitter to the time-sensitive media flows on which IP voice and video
rely".
Right now, Kelly adds, most suppliers
with an offering are running the real-time components on dedicated
hardware, either hosted in their own data center or in a hybrid
fashion, with some UC elements hosted and some located on the
customer's premises.
Who's buying it?
The
UCaaS message plays particularly well as a message with smaller
organisations, excited by the opportunity of giving employees access to
sophisticated UC functions for the price of a monthly per-seat
subscription. But larger organisations that have so far held back from
implementing UC internally because of technological or financial
concerns are interested, too.
Earlier this
year, IT market analyst firm Freeform Dynamics asked enterprises across
Europe how UC had been embraced by their organisation. Among
organisations with 5,000-plus employees, 32 per cent have fully or
partially implemented UC across their business. For businesses with
1,000-5,000 people, that figure slips to around 22 per cent. But
companies are certainly buying UC as a service. According to Radicati
Group figures, the worldwide UC as SaaS market is expected to reach 136
million subscribers (including both business and consumer customers) by
2012, from 46 million in 2008. That demand will generate sales of $28.7
billion, compared to $6.9 billion in 2008.
Where next?
As
discussed, UC (whether on-premise or hosted) needs to provide three
elements - telephony, messaging and presence - integrated into a single
interface. But the UCaaS market is moving fast, with providers quickly
adding new features beyond these core capabilities. These include
fixed-mobile convergence, collaboration and conferencing and
integration with core business applications, particularly in comms-rich
areas such as customer service and support. Companies need to find a
third-party provider whose portfolio offers a close fit with the needs
of their business at a per-user price that fits their budget. They'll
need to ask other questions, too:
- How scaleable is the partner's platform -
- How easy will it be to provision new users or decommission ones that have left the company? Does the platform partition the data of individual hosted companies?
- Can the provider update services while applications are online and in use?
- What security tools are in place to protect inbound and outbound communications from spam, viruses and policy violations?

post a comment